Skip to main content

Secondary Fermentation - When You Might Need It, and When You Don't

Earlier today read a very good article on secondary fermentation from Home Brew Supply.  It backed up what I've suspected and experienced.  I'll summarize here and share my experiences.

What is Secondary Fermentation?

Techincally, secondary fermentation is any period of additional fermentation or conditioning that takes place following the primary fermentation period.  Generally speaking, secondary fermentation involves transferring a beer out of its primary fermentation vessel into a second sanitized vessel.

The point of secondary fermentation is to get the beer off the original cake of yeast and the sediments that have fallen to the bottom of the fermenter.  When yeast goes dormant at the end of fermentation and begins to die off, the yeast cells will disintegrate and give off chemicals that negatively impact the flavor of your finished beer.

Is Secondary Fermentation Still a Valid Process?

The secondary fermentation process came into existence in the early days of home brewing.  In those days, the available brewing yeast often wasn't the most viable, and less was known by home brewers about how to keep yeast healthy.  As a result, the death and disintegration of the yeast cells (known as autolysis) was a very real possibility that could ruin a batch of beer.  Also, brewing ingredients, equipment, and methods were less advanced than they are today, so there was often plenty of sediment remaining in the beer after fermentation finished.  Transferring a beer to a secondary fermenter was a way to avoid off-flavors from autolysis and allow more of the sediment to fall out of the beer, making it clearer.

If you're using relatively fresh yeast, treating it well, and using good brewing practices, most experts say that secondary fermentation is mostly pointless.  Yeast is unlikely to undergo autolysis during the first month or so of fermentation, and most modern tools and techniques result in clear beer.

Are There Risks Associated with Secondary Fermentation?

Any time you disturb a beer before it's bottled or kegged, there is a risk associated with this.  If the beer comes into contact with too much oxygen, it will develop cardboard-like flavors.  If the transfer tubing or secondary fermenter aren't properly sanitized, bacteria and wild yeast may enter the beer and cause spoilage, souring, or unwanted off-flavors.  There's also a possibility of spillage... and no one wants that.

Are There Times When Secondary Fermentation is Worthwhile?

A good rule of thumb is that if your beer isn't going to be fermented longer than 4-6 weeks, there is no good reason to incorporate a secondary fermentation step.

However, there are two conditions under which you may want to consider a secondary fermentation:

  • Extended fermentation or aging:  The longer you plan to keep the beer in the fermenter, the more risk there is of autolysis occurring, though these days it's still pretty low.  Anecdotal evidence (of mine and others) suggests that even up to five months, depending on yeast strain and recipe, isn't too long to keep a beer in the primary.  A good rule of thumb, though, is to transfer to a secondary fermenter after about a month.
  • Large additions in secondary:  If you plan to add a lot of fruit puree or some other large addition during secondary, it may be better to put those ingredients in the secondary fermenter and carefully transfer the beer onto them, rather than dumping those ingredients into the primary fermenter.  This is because you could churn the beer too much adding these items and cause it to oxidize.  If you're careful, though, this may not be an issue.
I've personally had beers stay in their primary fermenter as long as three months without racking them off to a secondary.  Those beers were as tasty and clear as any I've transferred to a secondary.  Then again, I try to keep my yeast healthy in primary by providing it with yeast nutrient and oxygen from the start, so your experience may differ.

There's no substitute for experience.  Perhaps the next time you brew a beer that you would normally transfer to a secondary fermenter, you might try only transferring half of it and leaving the other half on the original yeast cake, to see if you can tell a difference in the two.  You may decide, as I have, that most of the time it's a waste of my time and effort.


Popular posts from this blog

Grainfather Specifications for BeerSmith, Beer Tools Pro, and Other Software

Recently, I've been trying to "dial in" settings in BeerSmith and Beer Tools Pro so that I can do a better job getting my actual brewing results to match up to the figures in the software. Below are some of the figures I've worked out with my US Grainfather. Given manufacturing variances and possible measuring errors on my part, these might not match exactly to yours, but hopefully they're close enough that it will help you. BeerSmith Equipment Profile: Brewhouse Efficiency: 83% (based on my experience, yours may vary) Mash Tun Volume: 8 gallons Mash Tun Weight: 8.82 pounds Mash Tun Specific Heat: 0.12 Cal/gram-deg C Mash Tun Addition: 0 gallons Lauter Tun Losses: 0 gallons Top Up Water for Kettle: 0 gallons Boil Volume: 6.25 gallons Boil Time: 60 minutes Boil Off: 0.40 gallons per hour Cooling Shrinkage: 6% Loss to Trub and Chiller: 0.53 gallons Batch Volume: 5 gallons Fermenter Loss: 0.40 gallons (yours may vary) Whirlpool time: 0 minutes B

Yellow Label Angel Yeast vs. Typical Brewing Yeast

I currently have my second batch of rice wine fermenting with the "magical" yellow-label Angel Yeast from China, and wanted to share some of the more unusual aspects of using it.  If you've never seen or used this yeast, I suspect you're not alone.  It ships in a 500 gram package that looks like this: What makes it "yellow label" is that yellow box you see in the upper left corner of the package.  This implies that it's yeast for distilling (though you do not need to have a still or distill the output to use it).  As I understand it, inside the package is a mix of yeast and other materials which will convert starch into sugar and directly ferment it, without the need for a traditional mash step.  This can radically shorten your brewing time.  For my most-recent batch of rice wine, I heated 3 gallons of water to 155F, poured it over 13+ pounds of uncooked rice straight out of the bag, let that soak for an hour, rehydrated some of this yeast in warm water,

Things I've Learned Brewing with The Grainfather, Part 2

In the last post, I shared an overview of The Grainfather, recommended equipment to use with it, and an overview of the brewing process.  In this installment, I'm going to talk specifically about mashing and sparging. Having brewed over a dozen batches with it, I'm finally becoming very comfortable with the device, the mash process, and how to get what I want out of it. I don't consider myself a "master" of it yet, though. For those who have never done all-grain brewing, I want to provide a quick overview of the mash process itself. Mashing - With or Without The Grainfather The goal of mashing is to turn the starches in the grain into sugars. More specifically, you want to turn the starches into a mix of fermentable and unfermentable sugars that provide the flavor profile associated with the beer you are brewing. A sweeter beer might warrant more unfermentable sugars. A more dry beer will demand few unfermentable sugars. To a great extent, controlling the