Skip to main content

Can a shorter boil be superior to a long one?

A beginning home brewer friend of mine asked a question that sounds like it should have a simple answer, but the answer isn't quite as simple as it seems at first glance.

His question: "I'm brewing a light-colored beer (a Kolsch).  I want to be sure it doesn't come out too dark. Should I limit my boil to only 20 minutes?"

The gut reaction when you hear this question is to say "No.  Boil for the full 60-90 minutes."  After all, boiling is important to breaking down proteins and making sure that you get the full bitterness from your hops pellets.  If you're doing an all-grain recipe for a light-colored beer like this, you probably want to do a full-size, full-length boil to ensure you get a good result.

An extract-based recipe changes the answer a little.  Malt extract doesn't generally need a full-length boil.  It's basically just a concentrated, already boiled wort.  You want it to boil for about 15 minutes to ensure that any bacteria or other nasties that might ruin your beer get killed, but boiling for 60 or 90 minutes isn't strictly necessary.  In fact, boiling a pale malt extract for too long can cause a Maillard reaction (sometimes referred to as caramelization) that can alter the flavor and color of the beer.  A 60-minute boil on an all-extract Kolsch might result in a light-brown beer instead of the familiar yellow or gold color.  It might also be annoyingly sweet for the style.  For a light-color, all-extract boil, I might very well not boil the extract for the full length.

For a light-colored recipe that includes some specialty grains, I might take a slightly different approach.  I'd steep the specialty grains as directed by the recipe.  Then I'd bring it to a boil and include my hops pellets.  If there are other non-extract components to the recipe, I'd add those as directed as well.  Then, during the final 15 minutes of the boil, I'd temporarily remove the kettle from the heat, stir in my malt extract until it's dissolved, and bring the wort back to a boil with my wort chiller inside.  That would kill off anything that might be in the malt extract (or on my wort chiller) that could ruin my beer.  As soon as the boil was over, I'd get the kettle off the heat, then use the wort chiller to bring the temperatures down as fast as I could to minimize any Maillard reaction.

But a 20-minute boil can be the right answer.  If you look in homebrew supply catalogs, you'll see 20-minute boil kits.  These usually include malt extract with few other ingredients.  These are usually lighter-colored all-extract (or nearly all-extract) recipes.  If you want to adjust from a 60-minute boil down to a 20-minute boil for an existing recipe, you'll need to keep an eye on the bittering.

Let's say you wanted to use the following simple recipe:
  • 6.5 pounds Golden Light DME
  • 1 ounce Cascade hops pellets (5.4% AA) for 60 minutes
  • Wyeast 1056

The Beer Tools Pro software says that if we boil the DME and hops for 60 minutes, we'll end up with a bitterness of approximately 20.6 IBUs, a color of 5.2 SRM, an original gravity of 1.054, and a terminal gravity of 1.013.  Realistically, there's a chance that if we boil that light colored DME for 60 minutes we'll brown it up a bit and miss our desired color.

What happens if I dial that back to a 20-minute boil?  Beer Tools Pro tells us that we will now end up with a bitterness of only 11.5 IBUs.  If our goal was 20.6, we're going to need to add hops pellets to get the recipe back on track.  How much more?  Beer Tools says we'll need to increase from 1 ounce to 1.79 ounces to maintain the same bitterness level.  Changing the boil time down to 20 minutes also means that more of the aroma compounds of the hops will survive the boil, perhaps altering the aroma of the beer slightly.

So the answer to the question of whether a 20-minute boil is the right choice or not depends on the style of beer you're making, the color of the finished product, and the amount of extract in the mix.  A 20-minute boil probably won't work well for an all-grain stout or porter, but it might be ideal for an almost-all-extract wheat beer, Kolsch, or light beer.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Things I've Learned Brewing with The Grainfather, Part 2

In the last post, I shared an overview of The Grainfather, recommended equipment to use with it, and an overview of the brewing process.  In this installment, I'm going to talk specifically about mashing and sparging. Having brewed over a dozen batches with it, I'm finally becoming very comfortable with the device, the mash process, and how to get what I want out of it. I don't consider myself a "master" of it yet, though. For those who have never done all-grain brewing, I want to provide a quick overview of the mash process itself. Mashing - With or Without The Grainfather The goal of mashing is to turn the starches in the grain into sugars. More specifically, you want to turn the starches into a mix of fermentable and unfermentable sugars that provide the flavor profile associated with the beer you are brewing. A sweeter beer might warrant more unfermentable sugars. A more dry beer will demand few unfermentable sugars. To a great extent, controlling the

Brewing with The Grainfather, Part 3 - Cleaning and Overall Thoughts

In Part 1 of this series, I introduced The Grainfather and discussed how to use it for mashing and sparging.  In Part 2, we talked about boiling and chilling the wort with The Grainfather and its included counterflow chiller.  In this final segment, we'll discuss cleanup and overall thoughts about the device and its usage. Cleanup Once you've pumped the wort from The Grainfather into your fermenter and pitched your yeast, you're well on your way to a delicious batch of homebrew.  Unfortunately, you've still got some cleanup work to do. The cleanup process in my experience will take 20-30 minutes.  It involves the following tasks: Removing and discarding the grain from The Grainfather's grain basket Cleaning the grain basket, kettle, recirculation tube, and wort chiller Cleaning all the other implements used in brewing (scale, scoops, mash paddle, etc.) At the end of the brewing process, there will be hops bags (if you used them), grain and other residu

Yellow Label Angel Yeast vs. Typical Brewing Yeast

I currently have my second batch of rice wine fermenting with the "magical" yellow-label Angel Yeast from China, and wanted to share some of the more unusual aspects of using it.  If you've never seen or used this yeast, I suspect you're not alone.  It ships in a 500 gram package that looks like this: What makes it "yellow label" is that yellow box you see in the upper left corner of the package.  This implies that it's yeast for distilling (though you do not need to have a still or distill the output to use it).  As I understand it, inside the package is a mix of yeast and other materials which will convert starch into sugar and directly ferment it, without the need for a traditional mash step.  This can radically shorten your brewing time.  For my most-recent batch of rice wine, I heated 3 gallons of water to 155F, poured it over 13+ pounds of uncooked rice straight out of the bag, let that soak for an hour, rehydrated some of this yeast in warm water,