Skip to main content

Affligem Abbey Tripel Clone 1.0

I've been trying to perfect a one-gallon brewing system that uses a Sous Vide cooker and induction cooktop to produce all-grain beer.  I've made four batches with it so far.  The first batches were all reasonably good but did not hit their gravity or volume targets.  I've been trying to dial that in for a while but haven't had much success.

Today I decided to brew a scaled-down recipe from the Candi Syrup Inc. web site.  This is their clone recipe for Affligem Abbey Tripel, with cane sugar replacing the clear candi sugar in their recipe.


2 pounds, 5 ounces Belgian Pilsner Malt
2 ounces Aromatic Malt
5 ounces Cane Sugar
0.15 ounces UK Challenger hops @ 6.8% AA 60 min.
0.20 ounces Styrian Goldings hops @ 2.8% AA 60 min.
0.20 ounces Styrian Goldings hops @ 2.8% AA 15 min.
0.15 ounces Styrian Goldings hops @ 2.8% AA 3 min.
1/8 tsp. Irish Moss
Wyeast 1762 Belgian Abbey II yeast

According to BeerSmith, the characteristics of this brew are:

  • Batch Size: 1.0 gallons
  • Estimated Pre-Boil Volume: 1.64 gallons
  • Boil Time: 60 minutes
  • Brewhouse Efficiency: 80%
  • Total Grains: 2.75 pounds
  • Total Hops; 0.70 ounces
  • Bitterness Ratio: 0.32 IBU/SG
  • Estimated Pre-boil Gravity: 1.063 SG
  • Estimated Final Gravity 1.011 SG
  • Estimated Original Gravity: 1.082 SG
  • IBUs: 26.3
  • Color: 5.4 SRM
  • Est. ABV: 9.4%
Actual post-brewing results were disappointingly different:
  • Pre-boil volume: 1.64 gallons (approx.)
  • Pre-boil gravity: 9.1 Brix or 1.036 SG
  • Post-boil gravity: 15.0 Brix or 1.061 SG
  • Post-boil volume: ?

The mash water was placed in a 2-gallon Ziploc bag and clipped to the side of a 4-gallon stock pot filled to a level within the Anova Sous Vide cooker's operating range (which took about 2.75 gallons).  This was heated to mash temp and when the water inside the bag was within a degree of the surrounding water, I added the grains.  Mash began at 149F and ended with a mash-out at 170F.

The bag was emptied over a strainer, over another 4-gallon pot.  I had a bit of an accident and scaleded myself pouring the wort out of the bag into the strainer, and ended with some wort and grain on the table around me.  Fortunately no hospital visits were involved.  This may have had some impact on efficiency this time around.  Hard to say.

Grain was sparged up to the 1.6 gallon level and the grain discarded.  1 gallon of mash water was used, and 6.8 quarts of sparge water were used (approx.).


As soon as the grain was sparged, a boil was started on the induction cooktop.  When the boil began, the following schedule was used:

  • 60 minutes:  Add 0.15 ounces of Challenger hops and 0.2 ounces of Styrian Goldings, also the cane sugar
  • 15 minutes:  Add 0.20 ounces of Styrian Goldings hops, Irish Moss, and yeast nutrient
  • 5 minutes:  Add Sweet Orange Peel, Styrian Goldings
  • 0 minutes: Turn off the heat, put on a lid, and put in mini-fridge to chill

The post-boil gravity measured 15.0 Brix or 1.061 SG, well below the expected 1.082 SG. Was that due to the spillage of grain and wort? Maybe. Either way, efficiency works out to about 56% on this batch, which is way below what I've been seeing in this setup.


I managed to squeeze in two brewing sessions today, both with disappointing results.  In both cases, my efficiency was well below what it normally is.

I could blame grain crush, since the earlier brew that hit 47% efficiency used grain I crushed myself.  But this batch used almost entirely grain crushed when purchased, and only hit 56% efficiency.  Even when I used only store-crushed grain, I never saw such low efficiency.  Something else must be at fault here but I haven't figured out what yet.

The spill of 170F wort and grain on my arms, hands, and work table was a bit of a disaster.  I'm not sure quite what went wrong there.  Maybe too much stuff in the bag?  Maybe I wasn't careful enough opening it?  Hard to say. It's something I need to figure out before I do myself some serious damage.

Update 08/12/2017:  The finished beer is actually pretty good.  I think if I scale this up to a full 5-gallon batch I might have the good "base Tripel" recipe I have been looking for.  In the next iteration, I'm thinking I'll replace some of the Belgian Pilsner malt with Cara-Pils to improve the head retention, add some sweetness, and improve the body a little.  I might also mash the grain at a slightly higher temperature the next time around, too.  Unfortunately, I haven't seen the real Affligem Tripel on store shelves in Ohio so I can't compare it to the real thing.


Popular posts from this blog

Grainfather Specifications for BeerSmith, Beer Tools Pro, and Other Software

Recently, I've been trying to "dial in" settings in BeerSmith and Beer Tools Pro so that I can do a better job getting my actual brewing results to match up to the figures in the software. Below are some of the figures I've worked out with my US Grainfather. Given manufacturing variances and possible measuring errors on my part, these might not match exactly to yours, but hopefully they're close enough that it will help you. BeerSmith Equipment Profile: Brewhouse Efficiency: 83% (based on my experience, yours may vary) Mash Tun Volume: 8 gallons Mash Tun Weight: 8.82 pounds Mash Tun Specific Heat: 0.12 Cal/gram-deg C Mash Tun Addition: 0 gallons Lauter Tun Losses: 0 gallons Top Up Water for Kettle: 0 gallons Boil Volume: 6.25 gallons Boil Time: 60 minutes Boil Off: 0.40 gallons per hour Cooling Shrinkage: 6% Loss to Trub and Chiller: 0.53 gallons Batch Volume: 5 gallons Fermenter Loss: 0.40 gallons (yours may vary) Whirlpool time: 0 minutes B

Yellow Label Angel Yeast vs. Typical Brewing Yeast

I currently have my second batch of rice wine fermenting with the "magical" yellow-label Angel Yeast from China, and wanted to share some of the more unusual aspects of using it.  If you've never seen or used this yeast, I suspect you're not alone.  It ships in a 500 gram package that looks like this: What makes it "yellow label" is that yellow box you see in the upper left corner of the package.  This implies that it's yeast for distilling (though you do not need to have a still or distill the output to use it).  As I understand it, inside the package is a mix of yeast and other materials which will convert starch into sugar and directly ferment it, without the need for a traditional mash step.  This can radically shorten your brewing time.  For my most-recent batch of rice wine, I heated 3 gallons of water to 155F, poured it over 13+ pounds of uncooked rice straight out of the bag, let that soak for an hour, rehydrated some of this yeast in warm water,

Things I've Learned Brewing with The Grainfather, Part 2

In the last post, I shared an overview of The Grainfather, recommended equipment to use with it, and an overview of the brewing process.  In this installment, I'm going to talk specifically about mashing and sparging. Having brewed over a dozen batches with it, I'm finally becoming very comfortable with the device, the mash process, and how to get what I want out of it. I don't consider myself a "master" of it yet, though. For those who have never done all-grain brewing, I want to provide a quick overview of the mash process itself. Mashing - With or Without The Grainfather The goal of mashing is to turn the starches in the grain into sugars. More specifically, you want to turn the starches into a mix of fermentable and unfermentable sugars that provide the flavor profile associated with the beer you are brewing. A sweeter beer might warrant more unfermentable sugars. A more dry beer will demand few unfermentable sugars. To a great extent, controlling the