Skip to main content

Belgian Trappist Single v2.2

Tonight I decided to run yet another test to dial in the gravity and volume calculations for my sous vide based brewing setup.  Since I had a Dubbel, Tripel, and Quad fermenting, doing a Trappist Single seemed like a good next step.

I have a Single recipe that I've been pretty happy with, but still wanted to tweak it a bit more.  This was a good chance to make those tweaks and see work on the calculations at the same time.


1 pound and 7 ounces 2-row Pilsner Malt
1 ounce Aromatic Malt
1 ounce Cara-Pils Malt
1 ounce Melanoidin Malt
0.15 oz. Styrian Goldings hops pellets @ 6.2% AA 60 min.
0.25 oz. Czech Saaz hops pellets @ 3.2% AA 15 min.
0.20 oz. Czech Saaz hops pellets @ 3.2% AA 5 min.
0.25 oz. Sweet Orange Peel
0.10 oz. Crushed Coriander
1/4 tsp. Irish Moss
Wyeast 3787 Trappist High Gravity yeast

According to my BeerSmith calculations, this brew should have the following characteristics:
  • Style:  Trappist Single
  • Original Gravity: 1.047 SG (11.7 Brix)
  • Pre-boil Gravity: 9.0 Brix
  • Final Gravity: 6.0 Brix
  • IBU: 25.5
  • SRM: 5.0
  • ABV: 4.9%
  • Volume: 1.0 gallons
  • BU:GU Ratio: 0.55
After brewing. the actual stats on this batch were:
  • Original Gravity:  12.0 Brix (vs. 11.7 expected) or 1.048 SG
  • Pre-boil Gravity: 7.0 Brix (vs. 9.0 expected) or 1.028 SG
  • Volume: 0.92 gallons (estimated)
  • Pre-boil volume: 1.56 gallons (measured)

The mash for this batch was done in a Ziploc bag, inside a stock pot full of water, to which the sous vide cooker was attached.  The sous vide cooker's temperature seems to be about 2 degrees below what it registers (i.e., if it says 156F the actual temp is 154F).  The contents of the Ziploc tend to be 3-4 degrees below the surrounding water (i.e., if the water is 156F, the bag's contents will be 152-153F).  Using this information, I adjusted the temperature settings so that I hit my intended mash and mash out temps.

Grain mashing in a Ziploc bag with the sous vide setup
The mash was conducted for 40 minutes at 156F, followed by a 10-minute mash out at 168F.

The grain was emptied from the bag into a strainer placed over the stock pot used for boiling.  As the grain drained and was sparged, the stock pot was heated to boiling.


Because I was trying to nail down calculations, I took a moment to measure the pre-boil volume.  It came out to 1.56 gallons versus the expected 1.64 gallons.  Pre-boil gravity was 7.0 Brix versus the 9.0 Brix calculated by BeerSmith.

The setup produces a good strong boil

The following boil schedule was followed:
  • 60 minutes:  Add Styrian Goldings bittering hops
  • 15 minutes:  Add Czech Saaz flavor hops
  • 10 minutes:  Add Irish Moss
  • 5 minutes:  Add orange peel, coriander, and Czech Saaz hops
  • 0 minutes: Turn off the heat, transfer the wort to a pitcher to measure post-boil volume
I achieved a post boil volume about 8-10 ounces short of the expected 1 gallon.  I'll use this info to tweak my calculations.


Trying to keep things simple, I transferred the wort into my plastic pitcher and placed it inside the mini-fridge to chill to yeast pitching temperature.  This will likely result in a cloudy brew, but my goal here was to check the flavor of the recipe and sort out calculations - not brew the clearest beer i could.

I had harvested a bunch of Wyeast 3787 from the BJ's Grand Cru clone I did last month, so I used some of that to ferment this beer.  If you've never used this yeast before, I strongly recommend a blow-off tube.  I've experienced some amount of blow-off with it regardless of the amount of head space, volume of wort, or gravity.  I set up a blow-off tube for this beer from the start.

The goal is to ferment the beer at ambient temperature with no temperature control for the first week, after which it will be moved to an insulated and heated chamber.  In there, it will be kept at 76F for another week or two until fermentation seems to have stopped.  After that, it will be bottled.

Post-Mortem and Other Notes

After my least batch in the sous vide setup, BeerSmith calculated my efficiency at 75% for the batch.  This time around, I used 75% as my estimated Brew House efficiency.  After completing the measurements, BeerSmith says I hit 71% efficiency for this batch.

I estimated boil-off for the setup at 0.64 gallons per hour. That's exactly what I achieved on this batch, going from 1.56 gallons to 0.92 gallons after a one-hour boil.

It looks like I probably needed about another 8-10 ounces of sparge water to hit the pre-boil volume on the nose.

Given that I used 2.5 quarts of water for mashing and 4.5 quarts for sparging, that's 7.0 quarts total.  My pre-boil volume measured as 1.56 gallons or 6.25 quarts.  This means the grain soaked up approximately 0.75 quarts.  That is 0.75 quarts for 1.69 pounds of grain or 0.44 quarts per pound.  I modified my spreadsheet to calculate future sparge volume based on 0.44 quarts being absorbed for each pound of grain.

One thing I have noticed about this setup in the last few batches is that it tends to not strain out all the bits of grain.  A certain amount ends up in the boil.  This is something to be addressed in a future run with the system.

Note all the grain particles in the pot at the boil
Update 07/25/2017:  The beer has a thin krausen on it now.  I'm not sure if it's hit the height of its fermentation or not yet, but there is very visible activity in the fermenter so I am not complaining.  It's beginning to lighten in color a bit, too, which is a sure sign that fermentation is underway.

Update 08/12/2017:  The beer has been bottled using Cooper's carbonation drops and has spent two weeks conditioning at 78F in the bottle to ensure carbonation.  It pours with a light level of carbonation, consistent with the carbonation drops but of course lower than a typical Belgian beer.  It pours an amber color, with a thin head that dissipates quickly.  The aroma is mild, with hints of fruit and spice.  The hops come through pretty clearly in the flavor, which is expected for this style.  I'll need to scale the recipe up to see if I am convinced it's better than previous attempts at a Single, but so far I'm hopeful.

Update 01/01/2018:  The beer has now been in the bottle for over four months. I poured the glass pictured at the start of the article today.  It pours a nice gold color with a thick white head that lasts for about 30 seconds before reincorporating into the glass.  The aroma is fruity, herbal, and sweet.  The flavor is dry and balanced, compared to the aroma.  Hops definitely balances the malt in this one, and takes the foreground after the initial sip and into the finish.  The finish is clean but with a lingering bitterness.  Let's compare this with the BJCP style guidelines:

  • Aroma (12 points max):
    • Style Definition:  Medium Trappist yeast character showing fruity/spicy/floral notes. Low grainy-sweet malt backdrop, possibly with light honey or sugar quality. 
    • My Version: Yeast character comes through clear, definite fruity notes, with malt there if you look for it. I'd score it an 9 here.
  • Appearance (3 points max):
    • Style Definition:  Pale yellow to medium gold color. Generally good clarity, with a moderate-sized, persistent, billowy-white head with characteristic lacing.
    • My Version: Definitely on the medium gold side, maybe a touch too dark. Clarity is decent but there is a slight haze. The large white head lasted a while but is not leaving behind lacing and wasn't what I'd call "billowy". I'd score it a 2 here.
  • Flavor (20 points max): 
    • Style Definition: Fruity, hoppy, bitter, and dry. Initial malty-sweet impression with a grainy-sweet soft palate and a dry, hoppy finish. The malt may have a honeyed biscuit or cracker impression. Moderate spicy or floral hop flavor. Esters can be citrus (orange, lemon, grapefruit), pome fruit (apple, pear), or stone fruit (apricot, peach). Light to moderate spicy, peppery, or clove phenolics. Bitterness rises towards the crisp, dry finish, with an aftertaste of light malt, moderate hops, and yeast character.
    • My Version: Starts mildly sweet and citrus, then dries out and becomes bitter and clean at the finish. The aftertaste is mostly hops and a hint of yeast.  A hint of biscuit malt. Floral hops come through. I'd score this a 16.
  • Mouthfeel (5 points max):
    • Style Definition: Medium-light to medium body. Smooth. Medium-high to high carbonation, can be somewhat prickly. Should not have noticeable alcohol warmth.
    • My Version: Definitely medium-bodied.  Not heavy or thick, but not watery.  High carbonation, on the effervescent side but not what I'd call prickly. No alcohol warmth. I'd score it a 4.
  • Overall Impression (10 points max):  
    • Style Definition:  It should be a pale, bitter, dry, and well-carbonated beer with a fruity yeast character, spicy-floral hop profile and soft, supportive malt palate.
    • My Version:  It's more gold than pale, coming in around SRM 6 by my best guess, so it's a little darker than the style wants it to be.  It's mildly bitter and well-carbonated, and the fruity herbal/floral hop profile is definitely here. If I was a judge rating this for another brewer, I might score it a 7/10.
  • TOTAL SCORE: 38/50

How would I improve the score?

  • On the aroma side, maybe increase the last Saaz addition by 25% or so, or add one closer to the end of the boil so that the aroma is enhanced a little.  This would also bump the bitterness up a tiny bit, which wouldn't hurt against the style definition. 
  • On the appearance end, I'd make sure it received gelatin finings before bottling to clear it up a bit more. I'd also swap some of the Pilsner malt for some Cara-Pils to try to improve the lacing. I'd like to add more Melanoidin, but that might bump the color up too much. 
  • For mouthfeel, maybe a touch more carbonation.
  • On the flavor side, increase the hops addition a little, but not much. It definitely tends toward hops right now, but could maybe use a slight nudge to get closer to the guidelines.

Other than the above, I think I've done as well as I can with this one.


Popular posts from this blog

Things I've Learned Brewing with The Grainfather, Part 2

In the last post, I shared an overview of The Grainfather, recommended equipment to use with it, and an overview of the brewing process.  In this installment, I'm going to talk specifically about mashing and sparging. Having brewed over a dozen batches with it, I'm finally becoming very comfortable with the device, the mash process, and how to get what I want out of it. I don't consider myself a "master" of it yet, though. For those who have never done all-grain brewing, I want to provide a quick overview of the mash process itself. Mashing - With or Without The Grainfather The goal of mashing is to turn the starches in the grain into sugars. More specifically, you want to turn the starches into a mix of fermentable and unfermentable sugars that provide the flavor profile associated with the beer you are brewing. A sweeter beer might warrant more unfermentable sugars. A more dry beer will demand few unfermentable sugars. To a great extent, controlling the

Brewing with The Grainfather, Part 3 - Cleaning and Overall Thoughts

In Part 1 of this series, I introduced The Grainfather and discussed how to use it for mashing and sparging.  In Part 2, we talked about boiling and chilling the wort with The Grainfather and its included counterflow chiller.  In this final segment, we'll discuss cleanup and overall thoughts about the device and its usage. Cleanup Once you've pumped the wort from The Grainfather into your fermenter and pitched your yeast, you're well on your way to a delicious batch of homebrew.  Unfortunately, you've still got some cleanup work to do. The cleanup process in my experience will take 20-30 minutes.  It involves the following tasks: Removing and discarding the grain from The Grainfather's grain basket Cleaning the grain basket, kettle, recirculation tube, and wort chiller Cleaning all the other implements used in brewing (scale, scoops, mash paddle, etc.) At the end of the brewing process, there will be hops bags (if you used them), grain and other residu

Yellow Label Angel Yeast vs. Typical Brewing Yeast

I currently have my second batch of rice wine fermenting with the "magical" yellow-label Angel Yeast from China, and wanted to share some of the more unusual aspects of using it.  If you've never seen or used this yeast, I suspect you're not alone.  It ships in a 500 gram package that looks like this: What makes it "yellow label" is that yellow box you see in the upper left corner of the package.  This implies that it's yeast for distilling (though you do not need to have a still or distill the output to use it).  As I understand it, inside the package is a mix of yeast and other materials which will convert starch into sugar and directly ferment it, without the need for a traditional mash step.  This can radically shorten your brewing time.  For my most-recent batch of rice wine, I heated 3 gallons of water to 155F, poured it over 13+ pounds of uncooked rice straight out of the bag, let that soak for an hour, rehydrated some of this yeast in warm water,