Skip to main content

Trappistes Rochefort 10 Clone Recipe and Brewing Experience

While seeking a good Belgian Dubbel recipe, I encountered a recipe on the Home Brew Talk forum for "Award Winning Dubbel XL" by forum member DubbelDach.  The recipe's author says it took third place overall in Appalachian Brewing Company's 2009 Homebrew Contest.  The author described it as having deep dark fruit and chocolate tones, and very much like Trappistes Rochefort 10.  I made some adjustments based on ingredients I had or could easily get locally.

In last week's post, you'll notice that I used Fast Pitch Starter Wort to grow a batch of actual Rochefort yeast from a bottle of Rochefort 10.  That's the yeast we'll be using here.

The photo at the left is of my first round of starters for the yeast.  I began with a 1 liter starter, then graduated to a one gallon starter to further grow the yeast.

If you don't have that or don't want to grow your own yeast, the original recipe recommended White Labs WLP530 Abbey Ale yeast.  I'm sure that would do well with the recipe also.

The Recipe

10 pounds Belgian 2-row Pilsner (Weyermann)
2 pounds Caramunich I
1 pound Special B
4 ounces Carafa I malt
1 pound D-180 candi syrup
1.2 ounces of Styrian Goldings @ 5.4%AA
0.7 ounces of Hallertau Mittelfruh @ 4% AA
0.5 ounces of Hallertau Mittelfruh @ 4% AA
1/2 tsp. yeast nutrient
1/2 tsp. Irish Moss
1/4 of a Campden tablet
1 container of yeast grown from a Rochefort 10 bottle

Batch size: 5 gallons
Expected OG: 1.088 (20.95 Brix)
Actual OG:  1.093 (22.1 Brix) but 4.5 gallons of volume
Expected FG: 1.013 (4.83 Brix)
IBU:  22.9
Color: 32.29 SRM

The actual Rochefort 10 beer reportedly has an original gravity of 1.097 or 22.9 Brix.  It also reportedly has 27 IBUs, so this clone is likely to come out a little less bitter and at a lower alcohol content than the original.

The Mash

Mash with 5.5 gallons
120 minutes at 154F
10 minute mash-out at 167F
Sparge with 2.25 gallons

I used The Grainfather for this recipe.  Their mash calculation suggested 5.5 gallons of mash water for the recipe, which works out to 1.66 quarts per gallon. It also suggested 2.2 gallons of sparge water.  While this figure seemed unusually high to me, I went with it.

I put 5.5 gallons of water in the kettle and added a quarter of a Campden tablet to remove chlorine and chloramine from the tap water.  I let this work while The Grainfather heated the water to 154F.  I came back an hour or two later, then stirred in all the grain and installed the perforated lid over the grain. I started the recirculation pump and left it.

At this point, I took some time to transfer a previous brew to a secondary fermenter, clean out that fermenter, assemble a new fermenter, etc.  Then I even went out to dinner and came back.  In the end, this mash ran for about 7 HOURS.  I heated the sparge water and brought the wort to the mash out temperature of 167F.  The grain was sparged using the heated water.

This yielded 6.5 gallons of wort at approximately 7 Brix.  The Grainfather tends to boil off a little under a gallon in an hour, so I knew I was looking at a long boil to get the final volume I wanted.

The Boil

The mash yielded a wort that was considerably higher in volume and lower in gravity than expected.  BeerSmith suggested an 18.9 Brix pre-boil gravity, but I got more like a 7 Brix.  I boiled the beer for about an hour before the first hops addition, to reduce the volume and increase the gravity.

60 minutes - Add 1.2 ounces of Styrian Goldings
20 minutes - Add 0.7 ounces of Hallertau Mittelfruh
15 minutes - Add Irish Moss, Yeast Nutrient, and D-180 syrup
7 minutes - Begin recirculating wort through the counter flow chiller to sterilize it
5 minutes - Add 0.5 ounces of Hallertau Mittelfruh
0 minutes - Turn off heat, remove hop spider, begin chilling and pumping to fermenter

My post-boil volume came out a little under 5 gallons, with a gravity of 22.1 Brix, which was a little higher than BeerSmith's suggested 21.1 - but the reduced volume probably accounts for that.

The Fermentation

I oxygenated the wort for 120 seconds with a tank of pure oxygen and an oxygen stone.  This, combined with the yeast nutrient would, I hoped, give the cultured Rochefort strain everything it needed to take off and begin fermenting.  I have no way to be sure how many cells I have in the Rochefort culture, so no way to know if this is underpitched or overpitched.  Since underpitching is common in Belgian monastery practice because it brings out the esters in the yeast, I'm not too concerned unless there are no signs of fermentation in the next three days.

After two weeks in the primary fermenter, I took a gravity reading of the beer with a hydrometer.  I registered 1.030, which was higher than expected but it had not changed for a week.  When I opened the fermenter, the yeast had completely flocculated to the bottom of the fermenter and the beer looked clear.  After tasting the sample used with the hydrometer, I decided to forego secondary fermentation and just bottle it.

On April 9, I bottled the beer with 5 ounces of corn sugar and a packet of Lallemand CBC-1 cask and bottle conditioning yeast.  Since I've had issues with some beers not seeming to carbonate as much as I'd like them to, I also dosed a few of the bottles with a Coopers Carbonation Drop to see how they turned out.  All the bottles were placed inside closed containers in case they exploded.

Additional Notes

April 3, 2016:  After 2-3 days in the primary, I saw very little indication that the Rochefort yeast had awakened and started fermenting.  The only vaguely similar yeast I had on hand at the time was a packet of dry Safale S-04 English Ale yeast, so I pitched that rather than leave the wort unfermented any longer.  The next day the airlock showed signs of activity and there was a krausen on the beer. Today I did a gravity check and the reading had dropped from the initial 22.2 Brix to 13 Brix.  This is with a refractometer, so the actual gravity is probably different.

April 9, 2016:  The beer was bottled with CBC-1 and 5 ounces of corn sugar.  On or about April 23, I'll chill and open the first bottle for carbonation and taste testing.  The initial flat, warm samples from the fermenter did seem to resemble Trappistes Rochefort 10, though I'll want to do a side-by-side test in the future to confirm.

Taste Test and Post-Mortem

Tonight (April 29, 2016) I did a side by side comparison with a real bottle of the beer.

The color on mine is a touch darker than the real Trappistes Rochefort 10, which is slightly reddish. My clone inexplicably doesn't seem to get a head on it, while the real beer has a very thick tan head as you can see in the photograph at left.  The head on the real beer stays there for quite a while.  A bottle of mine, poured into a chilled glass, will generate an incredible amount of head like the original beer.

The aroma of my clone is perfect.  To my nose, it smells exactly like Trappistes Rochefort 10.

The carbonation level on mine is much lower, except for the bottles with the extra carbonation drop.  Those seem to have a nice effervescent level of carbonation. They still don't get a head on them like the real beer.

The flavor of the real beer, compared to my clone, has a bit more caramel flavor to it and has a bit more of a burn because it's quite a bit higher in alcohol content, but it's otherwise very close. To my taste buds, the bitterness level is pretty much identical as well. The lack of the caramel flavor and a nice head are pretty much all that I can complain about on this one.

The next time I brew the beer (and the fact that I know there will definitely be a next time, tells you something), here are the changes I plan to make:

  • Replace some of the two-row pilsner malt with Caramel 40L to pick up the caramel and toffee flavors of the real beer.
  • Avoid using Fermcap-S during the boil, in case that's the cause of my beer's lack of head.
  • Add Carapils, Carafoam, and/or another grain with foam enhancing qualities in place of some of the 2-row, to see if that helps with head and retention.

I have to say that overall I am extremely happy with this beer.  Friends who have tried it have used the words "outstanding" and "awesome" to describe it.  Even if they didn't, I'm very happily drinking it myself - and that's the whole reason I got into home brewing.  I wanted to make beers that I loved, whether anyone else liked them or not.


  1. Good article. I'm wondering if your high FG was due to doing a bottle dreg culture? I've only done it once (for an Irish Red Ale) and also finished with a significantly higher FG. Do you think the 7hour mash might also do something with making sugars less fermentable? I'm sure this batch is long gone now, judging by the date of the article. Did you ever try brewing it again? Did it improve over time in the bottle?

  2. Using pilsner instead of 2 row should result in improved foam and head retention.


Post a Comment

Note that comments to this blog are moderated in order to minimize spam comments and things that might be offensive to readers.

Popular posts from this blog

Things I've Learned Brewing with The Grainfather, Part 2

In the last post, I shared an overview of The Grainfather, recommended equipment to use with it, and an overview of the brewing process.  In this installment, I'm going to talk specifically about mashing and sparging. Having brewed over a dozen batches with it, I'm finally becoming very comfortable with the device, the mash process, and how to get what I want out of it. I don't consider myself a "master" of it yet, though. For those who have never done all-grain brewing, I want to provide a quick overview of the mash process itself. Mashing - With or Without The Grainfather The goal of mashing is to turn the starches in the grain into sugars. More specifically, you want to turn the starches into a mix of fermentable and unfermentable sugars that provide the flavor profile associated with the beer you are brewing. A sweeter beer might warrant more unfermentable sugars. A more dry beer will demand few unfermentable sugars. To a great extent, controlling the

Brewing with The Grainfather, Part 3 - Cleaning and Overall Thoughts

In Part 1 of this series, I introduced The Grainfather and discussed how to use it for mashing and sparging.  In Part 2, we talked about boiling and chilling the wort with The Grainfather and its included counterflow chiller.  In this final segment, we'll discuss cleanup and overall thoughts about the device and its usage. Cleanup Once you've pumped the wort from The Grainfather into your fermenter and pitched your yeast, you're well on your way to a delicious batch of homebrew.  Unfortunately, you've still got some cleanup work to do. The cleanup process in my experience will take 20-30 minutes.  It involves the following tasks: Removing and discarding the grain from The Grainfather's grain basket Cleaning the grain basket, kettle, recirculation tube, and wort chiller Cleaning all the other implements used in brewing (scale, scoops, mash paddle, etc.) At the end of the brewing process, there will be hops bags (if you used them), grain and other residu

Yellow Label Angel Yeast vs. Typical Brewing Yeast

I currently have my second batch of rice wine fermenting with the "magical" yellow-label Angel Yeast from China, and wanted to share some of the more unusual aspects of using it.  If you've never seen or used this yeast, I suspect you're not alone.  It ships in a 500 gram package that looks like this: What makes it "yellow label" is that yellow box you see in the upper left corner of the package.  This implies that it's yeast for distilling (though you do not need to have a still or distill the output to use it).  As I understand it, inside the package is a mix of yeast and other materials which will convert starch into sugar and directly ferment it, without the need for a traditional mash step.  This can radically shorten your brewing time.  For my most-recent batch of rice wine, I heated 3 gallons of water to 155F, poured it over 13+ pounds of uncooked rice straight out of the bag, let that soak for an hour, rehydrated some of this yeast in warm water,